The Dead Nouns Faction

A minority bloc is running a patient, legal, and entirely rational trade on the Nouns treasury. Its strategy requires exactly two things: that dormant Nouns stay dormant, and that time stays free. This page exists to end both.

~320
Nouns accumulated
~24%
of votable supply
0.5–1.5 ETH
typical entry price
~2.8 ETH
book value per Noun

Everything below is analysis of public, onchain voting records. Conclusions about intent are inference — judge the pattern yourself.

The trade

Buy Nouns far below the treasury's book value per Noun. Then close the gap — not by building anything, but by freezing everything. Every grant funded is leakage from the position's collateral. Every quarter of inactivity accretes book value through staking yield alone. The position doesn't need to loot the treasury; statutory prohibitions, the veto, and criminal exposure make that a losing move. It just needs to wait. Patience does everything looting would, legally.

That's why we call the Nouns held this way dead Nouns: they exist to not-vote until the final hours, to not-fund, to not-build — to be a silent claim on ETH rather than a working piece of the project.

The playbook so far

Net effect: money in dead, money out dead, denominator frozen, book value ratcheting up on yield alone.

The two exits

Plan A  Buybacks

The treasury buys Nouns below book — framed as "treasury management," legal as an asset purchase. The long tail exits at a decent price, and every below-book purchase accretes value to the remaining holders — which, increasingly, means the bloc. They sell late, or emerge holding a dominant share of the claims.

Plan B  Entity conversion

DUNA → LLC via one more governance vote, after which distributions become ordinary corporate mechanics. The nonprofit prohibition dies with the nonprofit. Watch for the scouting parties: studies, legal reviews, and "modernization" proposals that price this route before attempting it.

Neither exit arrives labeled. Both arrive as reasonable-sounding proposals with reassuring names. So label them now, before they exist — that's what this page is for.

The euphemism watchlist

Per Article II: a proposal is structural if its calldata is structural, whatever the title says. These phrasings get flagged for human review automatically, regardless of the agent's verdict:

It will be calledWhat it is
"Treasury efficiency" / "treasury management"Below-book buybacks — Plan A
"Entity modernization" / "legal structure review"DUNA → LLC conversion — Plan B
"Sustainability" / "runway protection"Grant freeze made permanent
"Governance streamlining"Fewer, shorter, quieter votes
Weight arriving in the final hoursThe ambush — see Prop 955

What breaks the trade

The freeze has two dependencies, and only two:

1 · Dormant supply stays dormant

A standing vote breaks this. Pre-committed weight can't be ambushed, and proposals that clear quorum force every kill to happen in public, on the record, forever. That's what this project is: attention made cheap enough that dormancy stops being the default.

2 · Time stays free

Every funded grant leaks collateral toward the mission. Every public verdict, every flagged euphemism, every recorded kill makes the next quarter cost attention and reputation. Against a time-arbitrage trade, friction is the weapon.

Winning doesn't mean expelling anyone. It means repricing: making delay expensive and exits loud, until the rational move is to fund the mission, settle on terms everyone can exit through — or hold a pile of ETH attached to a brand whose people and CC0 soul moved on.